Zimmermann bribe allegation based on fabricated evidence
Well, well, well. It looks like US attorney, Tom Hefflefinger is attempting to frame up, and assassinate the character of, Minneapolis City Council Member Dean Zimmermann. Hefflefinger obtained a search warrant and was poised to move forward with a grand jury investigation, and seek an indictment for bribery and extortion, on the basis of fabricated evidence that was released to the public and accompanied by a sensational mid-afternoon raid just days before the 2005 primary election.
The linchpin of the Hefflefinger's case against Zimmermann is an audio-video tape recording of Dean Zimmermann allegedly being asked what he wanted, to which Dean allegedly replied "Money, money, money." The US attorney has refused to release that audio tape. However, the date of that alleged meeting between Zimmermann and the FBI's cooperating witness coincides with the date of a well publicized birthday party for Dean Z. In an interview with Minneapolis issues list member Wizard Marks (an except is pasted below), Dean Zimmermann reportedly admitted saying that he wanted "Money, money, money," in response to the question, "What do you want for your birthday, Dean?" which was shouted across the room in the presence of about 100 witnesses, according to Dean Z and his wife, Jenny Heiser.
US attorney Tom Hefflefinger should immediately resign or be fired, and face prosecution for official misconduct in relation to his investigation of Dean Zimmermann.
------------------------------
Excerpt from
Re: [Mpls] Re: Felien on Zimmermannwmmarks
Wed, 21 Sep 2005
Minneapolis issues listserv
Tim Bonham wrote:
Also, the concealing of this bribe money, by leaving it off the campaign finance reports, is another crime that is alleged.
Wizard Marks wrote:
I think the operative word here is "alleged." The affidavit the FBI presented to a judge for the warrant to seize Zimmermann's computer and campaign records asserts that Cooperating Witness Gary Carlson wore a wire and a camera for the first time on June 6 (affidavit Item #7).
I interviewed Zimmermann and his wife today. Zimmermann and Jenny Heiser (Mrs. Zimmermann) both agree that Dean Zimmermann could have met Carlson on June 6th, as the affidavit claims, but that there were over 100 people in the room with Zimmermann and Carlson at the time because it was Zimmermann's birthday party. The Zimmermann's also agree that Zimmermann said, "money, money, money". They further claim that his saying so was in answer to the shouted question from one attendee, "What do you want for your birthday, Dean?"
The FBI affidavit does not include any mention that there were over 100 people who heard Zimmermann say, "money, money, money" or what prompted the remark or in what setting the remark was made. Readers of the affidavit are led, through this omission, to believe that the meeting on June 6 was just between Zimmermann and FBI cooperating witness Gary Carlson. This FBI omission in Item #7 seriously compromises the integrity of the entire affidavit. The intended audience for the affidavit is a judge who can issue a warrant.
--------------------------------
Re: [Mpls] Z bribe allegation based on fabricated evidence Date: 9/23/2005 11:18:49 AM Central Daylight Time
From: Socialist2001 [Doug Mann]
To: mpls@mnforum.org [Minneapolis Issues listserv]
In a message dated 9/23/2005 "Michael Atherton" wrote,
Just for the sake of fairness, before calling for Mr. Hefflefinger's resignation, shouldn't we ask Mr. Zimmermann to make a public declaration of his innocence and provide us with his version of events?
Doug Mann Responds: Is it really fair to demand that Dean Zimmermann prove his innocence?
Just for the sake of argument, let us say that Dean Zimmermann is innocent, that he is being falsely accused of wrongdoing by the FBI's cooperating witness, and that Mr. Zimmermann's lawyer is competent and believes that his client is innocent. Dean's lawyer will almost certainly advise him to not provide us, and the FBI, with his version of events, because the FBI can use that information to build its case, coach its witnesses, etc.
What Dean reportedly told Wizard Marks in an interview concerning a meeting with the cooperating witness can be introduced as evidence in a court of law. According to Marks, Dean said that the FBI's witness accurately quoted him saying "Money, money, money" in response to a question about what he wanted, but the context was a birthday party attended by about 100 people. The FBI's affidavit quoted him out of context. That's an example of how evidence can be fabricated. If the FBI is willing to fabricate evidence to obtain a search warrant from a judge, why wouldn't the FBI fabricate evidence to obtain a conviction from a jury?
It is unlikely that the FBI will use an audio-video tape of Dean's birthday party as a part of the evidence it presents to a grand jury or trial jury, if the case ever goes that far. And in any event, I don't expect the FBI will ever produce the tape of the meeting where Dean allegedly tells the FBI's star witness that he wants "money, money, money."
-Doug Mann, King Field
http://educationright.com/blog
--------------------------------------
[Mpls] Re: Felien on ZimmermannSocialist2001 (Doug Mann)
Sun Sep 18 23:06:28 CDT 2005
The FBI's investigation of Dean Zimmermann reminds me of the Bush administration's investigation of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Bush claimed to have 'hard evidence' of WMDs, but didn't lay his cards on the table. Why? Because he was bluffing. I wasn't fooled. For those that were fooled by that ploy, remember the adage "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
The FBI was poised to go to a grand jury when they raided Zimmermann's house, then backed off. They evidently didn't have the critical hard evidence of a quid pro quo before or after the raid. And now that the FBI has blown the cover on its sting operation, it is unlikely to catch its prey with any new traps.
The FBI has made unsubstantiated allegations of criminal conduct against an elected public official, Dean Zimmermann, in the run up to an election. That's a serious abuse of police power, in my opinion.
-Doug Mann, King Field
Posted by educationright
at 11:11 AM CDT
Updated: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 10:18 PM CDT