Topic: Mpls City Council
-
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, it's probably a duck.
I am accusing the FBI of framing up Dean Zimmermann on charges of extortion and bribery because those charges are based on publicly broadcast, unsubstantiated allegations, and because of other facts that led me to the conclude that the FBI is framing up Dean Zimmermann.
Before I go further, I want to be clear that I am not a friend of Dean Zimmermann. I am not well acquainted with Dean Zimmermann, and therefore have no reason to trust him. Nor do I have any particular fondness for the leadership of the local Green Party, of which Dean Z is a part. Last year I was the target of a vicious smear campaign by the Green Party leadership, when I sought the Green Party's endorsement for the school board, which is why I didn't seek the GP endorsement this year.
EVIDENCE OF A FRAME-UP
Ed Felien, Publisher of Pulse of the Twin Cities wrote,
"According to a Federal affidavit and search warrant, Dean Zimmermann is alleged to have taken bribes in exchange for support on a zoning change for a developer...Gary Carlson, the developer who built the housing project at 2401 Chicago Ave., wanted to get more retail into the first floor of his building...[Carlson reportedly donated money to Dean Zimmermann's campaign fund and to FREE, For Redistricting, Evenly and Equitably. FREE sued the city over the redistricting plan that packed African-American voters into the 5th ward, and set the stage for contests between incumbant Greens and DFLers in wards 5 and 6. Dean is the current 6th ward city council member.]
"But Zimmermann didn't trade cash for a vote. He acted like an ombudsman shepherding Carlson?s request through the bureaucratic maze that is City Hall. That?s his job. His job is to cut through the red tape. In the end, Zimmermann looked at the proposal to add more retail and voted against it." -- What did Dean do wrong? Friday 16 September @ 06:55:33 http://www.pulsetc.com/article.php?sid=2052
The FBI obtained a sealed search warrant, raided the home of Dean Zimmermann 5 days before a primary election, taking as evidence not only campaign and personal financial records, but also computers, phones, and a large mailing that volunteers were working on.
The FBI released a statement that contained unsubstantiated allegations of criminal conduct by Dean Zimmermann, and claimed to have supporting evidence, such as audiovisual tapes of meetings between Zimmermann and a cooperating witness. Unsubstantiated allegations of a cooperating witness may be enough to persuade a judge to grant a search warrant, but are unlikely persuade a grand jury to grant an indictment.
The US Attorney was poised to go to a grand jury to seek an indictment against Zimmermann on extortion and bribery charges. Two Zimmermann campaign workers were reportedly scheduled to appear before a grand jury on Monday, 12 Sept. 2005. But their appearances were called off the day after the raid.
If the FBI really has the goods on Zimmermann, why didn't the US Attorney follow through on his plans to seek an indictment? Would the judge have approved the FBI's request for a sealed search warrent on the eve of an election if the FBI wasn't poised to immediately ask a grand jury to indict Zimmermann?
The FBI's unsubstantiated allegations of corruption by Dean Zimmermann clearly serve to damage the reputation of Dean Zimmermann and the Green Party. That's not necessarily a bad thing from the point of view of the Bush administration and Bush-Lite Democrats.
The intrusion of the FBI into the political process, in this case, represents a dangerous precedent, not only for Greens, but all actual and potential dissidents, including Democrats and Republicans.
Silence is complicity! I urge others to join me in calling on the US attorney to seek an indictment or to shut down the investigation and publicly acknowledge that the FBI does not 'have the goods' on Dean Zimmermann.
---------------------------------------
Re: [Mpls] The FBI frame-up of Zimmermann on extortion & bribery charges.
Date: 9/15/2005 12:10:23 AM Central Daylight Time
From: Socialist2001 (Doug Mann)
To: mpls@mnforum.org
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT), Loki Anderson writes,
I just don't see how this is helping CM Zimmerman. It has been only six days since the search warrant was executed. Obviously, the feds didn't have enough evidence for an indictment which is why the search warrant was sought in the first place. If an indictment is coming, it will happen when the us attorney's office is satisfied that they can make a case against Dean. And I agree that that needs to be soon. But asking to have everything tied up with a bow only six days after the search warrant was served is a bit unrealistic.
[Doug Mann responds] Tied up with a bow, as in gift wrapped? Yes, the as yet unsubstantiated allegations against Dean Zimmermann are a gift, to his opponent, who is endorsed by the DFL. Of course, an indictment, soon, like before the November election, would be an even better gift. We certainly wouldn't want the US Attorney to admit he doesn't have the evidence, and to shut down the investigation before the general election in November, n'est-ce pas?
[Loki Anderson is an associate chair of the DFL's 5th Congressional District organization.]
-Doug Mann, King Field
Posted by educationright
at 7:46 PM CDT
Updated: Friday, 16 September 2005 10:25 AM CDT